Town Board Debates Changing Number of Trustees, Approves Donation Requests for Community Organizations
During the workshop portion of the December 3 Town of Lake City Board of Trustees meeting, the first item on the agenda was to discuss the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) between the Town and County for the Sheriff’s Office. This topic has been discussed at length during town meetings of late, and progress can be tracked through previous issues of Silver World.Trustees did not come to a conclusion during the workshop December 3, as they have decided to hold off on making a decision until they have the opportunity for Sheriff Denim Starnes to meet with them in person.Trustees had been given a draft copy of an IGA prepared by Hinsdale County, and Mayor Dave Roberts said, “there is no action [to be taken tonight] on this. We all got a copy of the IGA that the County presented. The purpose of this is for us to have an open discussion, to gather some information, and I believe we had some questions for the Sheriff. He was going to try to be here this evening, but there is a truck accident apparently on Slum, and he’s stuck so he will not be able to make it.”“ I believe we will be able to get our questions answered before we move forward with this. I think it’s important for the trustees to be able to share their opinions, also, Dan [Krob, Town Attorney] is on with us tonight. One thing I want to say about the IGA is that I believe as a board, and I myself, we all believe it’s very important the citizens of Lake City have police protection.”Attorney Krob stated that he thought the IGA was “a pretty good framework” that just “needed details hammered out.”It should be noted that County attorney Michael O’Loughlin was in attendance during the workshop to represent the interests of Hinsdale County.Also during the workshop portion of the meeting was a topic previously discussed by trustees; the possibility of a 2026 election ballot question to reduce the number of Town Trustees.The conversation began with Town Manager Lex Mulhall saying, “there was discussion about this 630when there were only four trustees and we had three vacancies and we couldn’t get anyone to sign up. If this were something that we decided to do, it would not go into effect until 2028. I just wanted to see if that was something worth discussing or thinking about. I thought I would be negligent in not bringing it up since we had that issue for a while.” Mayor Roberts said, “I remember when that issue came up and part of it was because we couldn’t even fill seats. It’s also a lot to ask. Let’s face it, you’re all volunteers, minus your big check every month,” to which Trustee Diane Bruce said with a laugh, “89 dollars and 55 cents!”Roberts continued, “I was told that the board used to be smaller and it got changed to seven – six trustees and a mayor, where it used to be four trustees and a major and I still don’t have an answer as to why it got changed. It seems to me, if you can’t fill the seats, what’s the point? Maybe if there were more people willing to run and be more dedicated to the job. I’m not saying anything about [the trustees] not being dedicated; this is one of the best boards I’ve ever been a part of and I appreciate the time and effort you guys put into it. Anyways, we wanted to throw that out and get your feelings on it.”Trustee Jodi Linsey spoke up, saying, “I think you have a really valid point, but I would counter it with the fact that the more people you have sitting at the table, the better you’re going to be able to govern, because you have greater diversity and you have a greater opportunity. If you only have four people, they might all be of the same opinion, whereas when you have more people, you have more diverse ideas. I’m a proponent of diversity. Also, I’d like to point out that we did have a very dysfunctional and angry board for a while, and those people are no longer sitting on the board and I think we’re more productive now, and I think we all contribute, whether we were elected or appointed”.Roberts responded, “I appreciate that, and I do agree with the diversity piece. I just wonder if it’s overkill. There’s three commissioners.”Linsey retorted with, “they also make $75,000 a year.” Roberts agreed, saying, “we don’t have time to discuss that.”Trustee Woods said, “I support keeping it at seven. It gives more of our citizens a chance to take part in the political process and if we don’t, then only three people would be a quorum. So three people could make a decision for the whole town.”Mulhall agreed, saying, “in most cases, unless it’s a super majority.”Trustee Bruce said “I haven’t made up my mind. I see both sides of it, but of course, this would have to go to a vote of the people.” Roberts confirmed, saying, “that’s what [we need to decide]; is it worth putting it to a vote of the people. I think the key to this is, there are seats coming up [to the end of their term], and a big part of our board right now filled vacancies instead of being elected by the citizens. You talk about representation; we were at a point where we needed a body in that seat – for someone to jump on board, and it worked out well, thank you all, but…that was another reason. If we don’t have enough citizen participation to even have elections, then are we serving the people of the town?”Trustee Kendall, who was initially appointed as town trustee, noted, “I can see both sides; there was a vacancy and I was assigned to it and then I got re-elected. I can see the other side too, it’s getting hard to
